The Will, Gracefully Free
Salvation through
grace and grace alone. This is a bit of Christian orthodoxy that remains a
stumbling block to many an otherwise good Christian. It remains an
impossibility for them for the same reason Erasmus, the original Humanist,
argued that to permit so weighty a matter as the eternal salvation of the human
soul to depend only on God would deprive human beings of any worth or value.
Without some decisive participation in the transition from mortality to
immortality, mankind becomes nothing but automata, as little involved in their
growth and development as a rock or stone. In essence, it is argued that instead of inspiring men to become the very
image of God, Christian orthodoxy annuls the greatness that man can be heir to,
as well as the responsibility that may, if he is not diligent, consign him to
judgment and death.
Free will is the
key. Man must have free will in these matters or he is nothing. According to
various doctrines adopted in this context, man might have a little part in his
own salvation, with God carrying the heavy load, or a great part, with God
sitting happily as his child grows himself up. But always there is a definite
and decisive sovereign space for man apart from God that carries him to eternal
life.
And yet … the most
earnest of those who insist on the reification of man's free will in these
matter, many of them some of the most effective defenders of Christianity in a
dangerous world, have no problem with other gifts and capacities that they were
given. A powerful intellect, to take one
example, that has enabled them to discern and teach some of most subtle truths
of the Scriptures. They did not create that in themselves, but instead received
the potential at birth, were nurtured by their parents, teachers and mentors.
None of this bothers them at all: an undeserved gift, freely bestowed on them,
which gave them a full and fruitful life with God.
But, they say, it
was them that nurtured this gift with a will to become a better person, and it
was this personal act that was decisive, not the initial gifts and help along
the way. But this misses the point, so let me repeat it. It is incontestable that
a powerful intellect can be a critical aid in living a more fruitful life with
God and that in fact many of these people have utilized this capacity in their
Christian work. And there are many other gifts of the Spirit that come from God
- gifts of preaching, of teaching, of administration, or evangelism - that are
similarly critical for many people who are trying to live a Godly life. And all
of these gifts, properly received, are manifestly unmerited, transparently
undeserved, mere contingencies of our lives that could have been different -
except for the loving grace of our Father.
But to the Erasmus
Free Will junkies this is all just fine. They are not bothered in the least
that just about everything they hold of value in their lives as an actual
existing human being is contingent, unmerited, and undeserved, so long as they
can hold onto a singular human capacity: the free will, to choose salvation or
not.
But, alas, our free
will is no different from any other capacities and powers we possess. As we
look across the range of human beings, it is clear that some have strong wills
and some middling wills and some wills are downright weak or non-existent. This
is the way it is in this world; de facto equality of all human beings is, in
this context, a myth - or a desperately desired dream, depending on your
politics. Our wills are strong or weak depending on many factors, our DNA, our
upbringing, education, the wider culture we grow up in, the peers we choose at
critical life moments, parents, friends, wives, children … the list is endless
as to how and why we have turned out like we have. Because, to put it
succinctly, we are contingent beings, born into a world not of our making and
further formed by forces not in our control.
The degree of will
power we possess is important in how we navigate our time and culture, as are
such things as our native intelligence and our degree of sociability with our
fellows. But it cannot be the basis upon which admission to Heaven is predicated,
for the simple reason that it is limited and contingent just like all else in
this vale of tears and Heaven is eternal. You might just as well try to elevate
the number 212 to Infinity by some sort of legislative fiat. You can do it; you
can issue a proclamation about it; you can organize parades of ecstatics in the
street; but nevertheless a finite number will never in all of time and eternity
be Infinity.
And we can will as
hard as we like, with a will of iron and a purpose adamantine, and we will
never be more than contingent finite beings - unless, by the perfectly free and
unmerited grace of God the impossible is made possible by His Will.
Continue reading remainder of Post (if any) or read full Post with Comments by clicking here.